Iranian President we all know. We know how he is. We know as a reason. E 'was invited to speak at Columbia University, and this has sparked an uproar.
the merits, the mere fact that the Hitler of 2007 to propose a referendum on the state of Israel is weak at the knees. But I wonder, is it right to call a character so uncomfortable and put in a position where he would put the caller, if there at university in Tehran?
E 'right to get to his level, forcing it to dry answers?
Ahmadinejad at his house would do so.
Not knowing what the rule of law and market rules, does not know what could be the objection, the divergence, the contrast.
Iranian president in New Jork did the figure of the victim. A victim in front of Western imperialism which claims to be always right.
A gentleman, in my opinion, we must respond with facts. If he claims to be the absolute and the political wing of the Supreme Council of Ayatollah, then please explain what you said.
On the ground of demagoguery and the offense he wins. Vince who think like him. Vince intolerance.
civil protests in the square are the salt of democracy, but every now and then Ahmadinejad would be curious to ask the meaning of his accusations, and his statements. The justification of the crap that we propina every day.
In this way, the culture, and facts can destroy the fabric of dogma and absolute values, which is imbued with the mind of a man so determined, as ruthless as the Iranian president.
0 comments:
Post a Comment