Thursday, October 11, 2007

Velicity Von Working Again

Yunus and his Grameen Bank

Excerpt from the report on microcredit. Fable interesting ...


Grameen bank was founded in 1976 in for Bangladesh by Muhammad Yunus. Literally Grameen means "village bank".

beginning of the 70th Yunus was a young assistant at the university and began to notice something was wrong. The percentage of poor in rural villages in Bangladesh was very high and most regrettable is that the poor remained poor. Economic theory studied at university, Keynes, the neo-classical, money, not enough to Yunus. He did not understand why the banks offer money only to those who more than others did not need it. According to the economic attractiveness of the growth of the problem was that the least developed countries. The concept of credit was done only on collateral, and therefore the poorer sections of society were disadvantaged by failing to ensure nothing if not his person.

After graduation, Yunus discovered America. The trip to the West opened the mind of the young Asian. Development, growth, welfare foundations of society were the stars and stripes. And most unusual thing was that people were good for their own merit. The state in fact was neither "little father" as in Mao's China, no big brother as in the Soviet reality.

Yunus was impressed. He came from an economically backward country. The order of things he was used did not coincide with an established and growing as the American empire. The society of Bangladesh, like all other countries that were slowly detaching from India was a reality that was in the middle of two extremes absolutism: the real socialism and religion.

Uno Stato che prendeva tutto e si occupa di ridistribuire in forma eguale a tutti era la prassi a est, e in alternativa la via era quella della teocrazia. In tutti e due i casi gli effetti erano gli stessi.

Assoluta povertà, crescita frenata, e ruolo della donna relegato a oggetto di casa.

La svolta comunque si ebbe nel 1974. Yunus tornò dall’America, e l’esperienza coincise con la grande carestia che attanagliò il Bangladesh. Migliaia di poveri costretti alla miseria e uno stato che non sapeva come fronteggiare il bisogno di tanti.

At that time Bangladesh enjoyed as all countries' development aid from the World Bank. Aid in the rain helped a few seconds Yunus at the expense of many.

The World Bank annually issued loans and aid to the country. The Government, however, could not redistribute evenly aid as a share-citizens did not lead to any growth due to the large mass of offenders. Lacking economic culture, the investments were too low because visible. The money ended up and then to swell the coffers of banks and the already powerful caste in the country. Uscire da una situazione così complessa appariva difficile, anche perché la situazione internazionale era complessa. In piena guerra fredda paesi come l’India manifestavano la chiara volontà di non allinearsi, in quella sorta di ambiguità che non portò sicuramente benefici di alcun tipo ai vicini della più antica democrazia del mondo.

Yunus non accettò tutto ciò e venne folgorato da un’idea. Perché non aiutare i poveri concedendogli prestiti?

La garanzia sarebbe stata la sua stessa dignità. Il povero garantisce se stesso. Yunus aveva ben chiaro che concedendo piccoli prestiti to many, would have been so many people out of poverty.

Why not do charity ol'elemosina? According to Yunus, the concept of gift is ill-suited to a reality in need of "doing" as that of Bangladesh. If you give money to the poor to eat, when he finished eating will still need money. In the long run will understand that the poor will always eat, but do not create wealth, but taking advantage of the kindness of others. This can only lead to a redistribution of wealth, but merely a logic of "hand pass" and not economically advanced. In fact, the passage money has no return in terms of wealth creation. This can only be detrimental to the economy.

The banks were not willing to help the poor because there was no guarantee that the loan would have been unable to comply. Yunus then took the trouble to give him the same loans giving incentives to the poor. The loans were usually in groups. The group was the guarantee. The guarantee that if one had not paid the debt, all the others could not get new loans.

The sum of the loans were later released only to start a business. On the one hand to stimulate the supply of lavoro creando ricchezza, e dall’altro incentivava i poveri a restituire il prestito.

Seppure i prestiti erano piccole somme dotate di interessi abbastanza elevati, il povero sapeva che se voleva mettere su un’attività propria e uscire da una condizione di miseria, doveva per forza adempiere ai propri obblighi costantemente, pena il ritornare alla condizione di povertà antecedente al ricordo al credito.

Yunus era certo che tutti avrebbero operato in questo senso. Contrarie invece le grandi banche del paese che vedevano il povero sempre più povero, identificandolo solo in base a quello che aveva, e non a quello che poteva diventare.

Yunus trovò sempre difficoltà nel rapporto con le banche e in particolare con la Banca Mondiale , criticata spesso dall’economista per l’insensatezza degli aiuti a “pioggia” come già ricordato.

Grande attenzione era al ruolo delle donne. Yunus era credente. Musulmano praticante. Ma si rifiutava di considerare la donna come un’oggetto e rifiutava l’idea che fosse solo il marito a doversi occupare della famiglia.

La donna per Yunus doveva entrare nel circolo vizioso dell’economia e responsabilizzandola anche tramite incentivi al lavoro, poteva fare uscire la sua figura da quella condizione di ghetto che ancora, nel 2007 la attanaglia in tante realtà nei paesi in via di sviluppo.

Ecco perché Grameen ha concesso soprattutto a donne sia la possibilità di lavoro e sia la concessione di prestiti. Il 90 % dei soggetti che hanno ricevuto prestiti sono appunto donne. Donne vogliose di libertà, e donne che hanno capito che la parità sessuale è la prima condizione per una crescita nell’interesse dei cittadini.

Seppur tra mille difficoltà il progetto Grameen, da piccola realtà si è espanso in tutto il paese.

Dopo tanta fatica le è stata concessa lo status di banca. Banca diversa sì. Ma pur sempre banca con tutte le agevolazioni che hanno gli istituti di credito in materia di aiuti e prestiti.

Partendo dal 1974, anno della carestia quindi, il percorso di Yunus e di Grameen attraverso numerose prove.

Nel 1976 il villaggio di Jobra e altri villaggi che circondano l'Università di Chittangong divennero le prime aree in cui era possibile usufruire dei servizi della Grameen Bank. La Banca obtained an immense success and the project, with the support of the Government, was extended in 1979 to Tangail district (north of the capital Dhaka ). The Bank's continued success and soon expanded to several other districts in Bangladesh until 1983 Parliament has transformed it into an independent bank.

elevatissmo The rate of loan repayment to the Bank slowed in 1995 to boycott because of the nature of religious fundamentalist implemented by some sectors of society against the Bank's objective to improve the status delle donne. Il boicottaggio rientrò presto; purtroppo l'andamento dei rimborsi alla Banca entrò nuovamente in difficoltà nel 1998 a causa dell'inondazione del Bangladesh ed ha ripreso il suo ritmo solo di recente.

La Banca oggi continua ad espandere la propria attività in tutto lo Stato e tuttora fornisce piccoli prestiti ai poveri delle campagne. A metà del 2006 le filiali della Grameen Bank ammontavano a più di 2.100.

Alcuni dati aggiornati al 2006 ci mostrano come Grameen sia una realtà ora affermata in tutto il mondo, sia in paesi sviluppati not.

An unusual feature of the Grameen Bank is that it is the property of their indigent clients funded by the bank, most of whom are women. Customers financed hold a 94% stake in the bank and the remaining 6% is owned by the Government of Bangladesh.

Other facts relating to the Bank, updated in May 2006 are as follows: The total amount of funding is 6.39 million customers, 96% of whom are women.

The Bank has 2185 branches in 69,140 villages with a total of 17,336 employees and a repayment rate of loans is 98.45%.

The total of loans granted since the banking amounted to Taka 263.84 billion (5.34 billion U.S. dollars). Of them have been returned to Tk 234.75 billion (4.73 billion U.S. dollars).

The bank also based on the mechanism sixteen principles summarized in the statutes of the bank:

1. We want to follow and uphold the four principles of Grameen Bank (Discipline, Unity, Courage and Hard Work) at any time in our lives;

2. We want to bring welfare into our families;

3. We do not want to live in ruined houses, we want to repair our houses and we want to work to build new ones as soon as possible;

4. We cultivate our gardens all year around, we want to eat plenty of vegetables and want to sell the surplus;

5. In the period of seed we plant the greatest possible amount of shoots

6. We plan births so that our families are small, we want to contain our costs and we want to take care of our health

7. We want to educate our children and be assured that they can earn to pay for their education;

8. We want to keep our children and clean the environment;

9. We want to build and use latrines with septic tanks;

10. We want to drink water from wells dug up the slopes, and if not available, boil water or we use alum;

11. not vogliamo accettare nessuna dote ai matrimoni dei nostri figli maschi né vogliamo darne per i matrimoni delle nostre figlie: manterremo i nostri villaggi liberi dalla maledizione della dote; e non celebreremo nessun matrimonio tra bambini;

12. Non vogliamo infliggere alcuna ingiustizia a nessuno né consentiremo a chicchessia di farlo;

13. Vogliamo fare insieme investimenti comuni sempre più cospicui dai quali ottenere redditi sempre più alti;

14. We are always ready to help one another, if someone / a is in trouble him / her help;

15. If we come to know of breaches of discipline in some village, we will go to lend a hand to restore it;

16. will participate together in joint activities.

The new frontiers of Grameen are open. To keep pace with the times have been proposed several changes to the original system of the bank. The main innovations concern the range of financial products. The novelties are contained in the paper of Yunus in 2002 called "Grameen Bank 2" . The name of the project, Grameen Generalised System have resulted from the need to make the whole system less rigid and standardized, the more elastic that it can be even closer to people's needs, trying to protect and enhance the unique personality and identity.

Effettuando una prima analisi in parallelo fra modello tradizionale e modello generale di sistema possiamo immediatamente scorgere la coerenza di fondo del nuovo progetto rispetto al sistema originario.

Il concetto di solvibilità del povero resta un punto focale ed immutato, confortato da nuovi dati empirici, i quali evidenziano un’altissima solvibilità (98%) di tutti quegli individui che avendo sforato la data di scadenza del prestito si impegnano ad un totale rimborso, maggiorato degli adeguati interessi, in un tempo futuro. La valorizzazione delle attività comunitarie inerenti il lavoro, e la modalità di concessione ed erogazione del credit to small groups of people, concepts remain extremely tight.

The centrality of the female category, act as an agent privileged access to credit, is strongly supported.

The new system offers some tricks and new concepts / products, which apparently differ from the classical canon, as we shall see, however, does not pose absolutely contradictory, but are running it. Among the highlights of this new structure of the Grameen Bank are:

- Flexibility in terms of loan amounts, terms and maturities.

- Customizing ad hoc micro-credit programs.

- Access to credit is also allowed to private individuals.

- New lines and pension insurance.

- Outsourcing of utility and disutility of internalization, the individual may make in relation to the working group (removal of common mutual fund group).

- System of proposals aimed at meritocracy not hesitate inequalities.

- Elimination of the poor practices that led to states of stress and nervous tension.

microconcetti As appears from the above, despite having given the impression slightly individualistic micro-credit system, the new structure has not diminished in any way the original orientation tended sociality and relatedness within the horizontal relationships among members of the working groups, and indeed it has greatly increased if we consider the relationship “verticali” che intercorrono fra Grameen Bank e singolo utente, ovvero la persona nelle sua interezza e poliedricità.

La soluzione tesa all’accoglienza e valorizzazione di ogni singola persona, che operativamente si

traduce in termini di flessibilità ed individualizzazione di alcuni aspetti del programma di

microcredito è stata una scelta sicuramente opportuna ed efficace, soprattutto ora che la

struttura organizzativa della Grameen Bank è in grado di poterla support and maintain a proper and rigorous.

The Grameen project goes ahead then. The basic concepts remain even if the challenge is still open, especially compared to a globalization that continues forgetting back larger and larger groups of people, that even before the media does not have the tools to keep pace with the times.

Grameen is this: give the poor tools.

Thursday, October 4, 2007

# Sony Network Camera Snc-m1″

But there is no democracy in Russia?


Since 2000, the advent of the former KGB official, in Russia everyone is wondering if it is still possible to speak of democracy. The fate of Putin every year are becoming increasingly worrisome.

There is no global diplomatic conflict where the somehow Russia is not present.

The United Nations is blocked by the vetoes of the former Soviet Union and still Communist China.

The mysteries of the past political assassinations thicken and is increasingly involved with the Russian state apparatus, though on a purely indirect as in the new tactics of Putin.

Global warming seems to have led at least one advantage: the winter is not as cold as it has always been, and Gazprom does not have the ability to make us shake your teeth for four months a year.

The Russia so it's in our heads every day and is present in current international.

The presidential elections in 2000 and 2004 were won by majorities Putin to Bulgaria for the lack of a real opposition.

repression protests and bureaucratic constraints have been implemented systematically by the apparatus of internal security of the Russian Federation.

On December 4, 2007 will be held instead of the parliamentary elections where the presidential party, United Russia, seems to have no rivals. Former chess champion Kasparov is doing everything possible to bring thousands of people in the streets. But people are afraid. She is afraid as she had when the streets were wanted by the military muster Brezhnev and Khrushchev during the years of terror. Then it will be difficult for liberals, Communists and reformers get a better result than that of 2003 where a 40% Russia United got more than a majority of seats in the Duma. For December a result it is feared even more extreme with the party able to bear up to 50% of the vote.

Apparently there is nothing wrong with numbers. No harm if one does not know what is happening in Russia is evolving and how the internal political system.

The other day the Russian President said goodbye to power is back. At most it will be a goodbye. New Constitution forbids that we can resubmit three times for president. The fact remains that Putin possa presentarsi come primo ministro per un mandato per poi tornare il sella nel 2012 per la prossima legislatura. A questo punto tutto si gioca intorno alla nomina che farà il principale partito alla guida del Paese. Russia Unita appunto.

Nel discorso dell’altro ieri Putin ha indicato che il suo successore dovrà essere «una persona perbene, capace e moderna disposta a lavorare in squadra con lui». Insomma, un presidente fantoccio, che, salvo colpi di scena, risponderà al nome dell’attuale premier, il fedelissimo e sconosciuto Viktor Zubkov.

Medvedev, l’altro possibile candidato, son of power and energy industry, seems too young to take the helm of the Motherland Russia. It is also said to be in place for an attempt to curb his ambitions of power, deemed too explicit by the entourage of the president. All that remains is then Zubkov, a man of trust and unknown. That is indeed harmless. Early next year the two will exchange functions at least in formal terms, but Putin remains the only real boss.

The Russian press claims that the Russia is taking the form of a parliamentary republic, leaving the presidential model. But it seems an excuse, because the reality is that in the next legislative power is ever more firmly in the hands of Vladimir.

The oligarchic regime is already set long ago. The "caste" Boris Yeltsin asserted that industry has made its way to monopoly Gazprom, which has eaten away all the others players in the exploitation of energy resources. The State has purged by Gazprom and dismantled the last remnants of what was the counter-revolution for democracy.

The former Yukos boss Khodorkovsky Mikhial before being arrested and sent to prison in Siberia has risked his life for have turned against Putin.

And then he, the arch-enemy, the oligarch of oligarchs, Boris Berezovsky who has vowed that the war on Putin, and then to the entire Russia. The air and oil magnate was the most pampered in the Kremlin when Boris Yeltsin was.

in '99 when it was clear that Yeltsin chose Putin as his successor, for Berezovzki things began to change. From operator of power began to become suspicious of power. That was a difficult period. The cruel blow Russia Chechnya Berezovsky and felt that it was time to breathe deeply.
also because the judges, with no more to protect Yeltsin's oligarchs, and went on to question his shares in the state company Aeroflot and the legality of his ownership of Logovaz, the company that made cars of the Soviet state, privatized.
During one of his frequent visits to London, chose to remain there.

had meanwhile sold its interests in media, including the supervision of business newspaper "Kommersant .
He left so half his latest project politico: nel 2000 aveva creato dal nulla uno spontaneo partito politico , « Russia Liberale », che secondo le sue intenzioni doveva unire in un blocco tutti gli uomini d’affari (del suo stampo) « sostenitori del libero mercato ».
Partito finito nel nulla da quando manca di spontanei finanziamenti e da quanto i comunisti sembrano l’unico tentativo di andare contro il sistema attuale.

Con Berezovski si è chiusa definitivamente l’era degli oligarchi. Quelli che rimangono rispondono direttamente a Putin. Le libertà economiche in Russia sono arrivate before those policies.

But these freedoms were the first also to become less "free" and more governed from above.

At the end of the first of '89 has not changed much. What will change from a state that dominates the economy in a state dominated by a subject that dominates the economy? Nothing. Only the power shifts from direct to indirect.

This seems to be the new way to New Russia, as new as the old mechanisms and logic of power sharing.

The idea flashed in the Kremlin to give the Putin government, before returning to the place that most are concerned, does not go in the direction you would like the International Community.

The recent show of force on the missile system and reset the strategic decision by Putin goes hand in hand with the economic ladder.

The bases are still lying on the Volga and Polyarny the Kilo class submarine, Minsk and Kiev, which so frightened at Kennedy during the Cold War. That is why any attempt to shake the Russian military pride by Putin, can not fail to think of memories scary stories and we wanted to forget.

United States, to the mouth of Rice, categorically condemns the idea of \u200b\u200bindirect management of power by Putin. But they're waiting for the events, because after that open up another front of terrorism and the axis of evil, seems excessive even for a global empire like the stars and stripes.

In recent days two events have deeply shaken, however, the ambitions of Russian power.

Burma Ukraine.

I monaci buddisti hanno dato fastidio. Il regime birmano non è così brutale come ora i mezzi stampa lo dipingono. Non a caso la protesta è nata su un imprevisto aumento della benzina. Un fatto economico appunto. Non certo per i diritti civili, calpestati si come in ogni altro regime, ma con una brutalità nemmeno paragonabile a quella nord coreana o quella cinese. Chissà se Putin non ha pensato che scene come quelle di Rangoon possano accadere anche a Mosca?

In fondo la situazione, non è poi così diversa. Fa forse solo impressione che il governo russo sia in giacca e cravatta, e invece in Birmania ci sia una giunta militare che governa. Per il resto le analogie sono evidenti.

In Ukraine, the helm of the former Soviet Union, the situation is complex and it seems that from here we can outline a bump in the strategies of Moscow.

After the Orange Revolution that the axis of the blonde Timoshenko and Yushchenko won the election the pro-Russian Yanukovich can not claim power. The man trusted Moscow to Kiev was supported by all the means by Putin, but that was not used to stop the will of the majority of the new Ukrainian people.

Moti, in Ukraine, which traditionally anticipate the fate of the Russian big brother.

Putin knows it. This is why Gazprom has already put on the alert that if Ukraine does not respect its commitments in debt against the energy giant, the valves will be closed again, as two winters ago.

But Putin also knows that the Georgia is waiting for the events, and NATO is a ghost who wanders more and more rooms in Tbilisi. If the ambiguity remains in the fight against terrorism, with the usual verbal violence against the Chechen rebels, and the usual grumbling to the Iranian nuclear decisive at this point will also be the U.S. presidential election.

If friendship with Bush is steadfast and has granted its time of "peace force ', we do not know how events will develop in the case of an exponent of democratic victory. Limestone hand could snug increasingly towards Moscow, the hardening of the relations to the U.S., which is not at all desired by Washington for the reasons listed above.

democracy in Russia, however, still seems far away. The clouds on the sky of Moscow did not presume anything good.

Too often we recognize the merits of Putin as a great power, leaving to run targeted killings, political and economic strategies, which would not be tolerated if committed by other states.

Frequently you pretend not to see a system like that in Russian there are balances to the executive. The judiciary and the parliament, for what it is now, are completely subservient to the Kremlin, in similar style to the Soviet Union.

Real politik then working progress or simply waiting for the events?

One thing is certain.

The Russia slowly evolving . But more and more is coming back to what it was, and what we thought was dead and buried. Who knows when you really realize that.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

2.4 Ghz Antennas It Does Work!!!

Israel is acting unilaterally? Hamas vs. Fatah

Sad it or not Israel its part will make it.

The ball, as usual, go to the ANP and Abu Mazen. The criticisms that are often public opinion that Jerusalem is often acting unilaterally. It 'happened so many times and last but not least, the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip by Ariel Sharon.

But since when are the conciliatory gestures in international relations, agreed?

Maybe as a gesture leads to another there can be no negotiations. I do not remember acts of particular importance made it from there Abu Mazen Arafat (apart from giving up to 98% of the promises he asked at Camp David).

not remember even conciliatory gestures by Hamas, in Gaza, but apparently the word "restraint" do not know what that means.

then await events.

Unfortunately many hooks are launched. The fish smells and takes a different route though.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Buy A Portable Tv Awonderful Historical Novel



(AP) - GAZA, 29 September - Nine injured in two serious in a brawl erupted between Hamas and Fatah supporters at a mosque in Khan Yunis in southern Gaza Strip. The clash, which occurred during evening prayers, an imam would explode after close to Hamas would begin to take his sermon the preacher taking the place of Fatah. In the brawl were used sticks, chairs, knives and even firearms. Investigations are underway to identify those responsible for the injury.

(source loop)


Two people, 3 states. This seems harsh reality ......

Does Vicodin Lower Blood Pressure

Taliban to power?

Karzai opens up to the Taliban. The news for the truth is not new. Already a year are frequent contacts between Kabul and the provinces to the south of the country, where there are outposts of the "rebels" of Afghanistan.

The move is important because it never The Afghan administration has been so blunt in asking the Taliban to re-enter the political arena.

Among other things, the declaration came after Karzai's visit in the U.S., it is considered that any decision has been agreed in advance with Bush and with the Europeans.

Spawns Civil uncivilized people could be relevant to a sort of national reconciliation .

Less than a year ago, our politicians contended that Fassino's words at the conference also called for the Taliban in Afghanistan. Karzai is then following the idea of \u200b\u200bthe Secretary of the DS? Rather once again our political class is debating anything, forgetting the course of events .

The point, however, is another. Whilst it may be that the Taliban still support it explicitly Al-Qaeda, the fundamental assumption of the war was that allowing the Bush doctrine, "who helps the enemies of the USA, must be pre-emptive strike."

So, I wonder. The decision to extend a hand to aid the enemy by Karzai (and we think also the U.S.) was taken for what reason?

From a military point of view this may be technical impossibility of a complete raid to break all of the last pockets of resistance. At that point, however, would be an admission of defeat in front of a country that has already resulted in bad Russian bear.

At the political level but the situation would be more serious than you think. The consensus is therefore growing Taliban. The indifference in front of Pashtun Taliban would not help.

In this case, the scene in an attempt to incorporate the Taliban could lead to a reduction of the existing proposals to Karzai.

The danger is, however, that the dream of reconciliation is fading fade away as Palestine.

brought Hamas to power has not eliminated the military vocation ideological

Friday, September 28, 2007

Ccd Minidv Digital Panasonic Pv-gs120 Camcorder

U.S. and EU together against the crisis in Burma

The increase in gasoline makes bad jokes in a country that for 40 years under a military-style socialist.

The UN, as usual, is locked to the vetoes of Russia and China.

Objectivist explains it very well here . Jim Momo stresses as well as India, the oldest democracy in the world, do not scruple to protect the Burmese junta ( here). The chronicle of events is cruel. RDM20 explains here and Enzo Reale here.

Aid to how things really are in the blog this case, they are giving.

free-lance journalists who risk their lives to inform on one of the bloodiest regimes that still exist on Earth.

scheme that led, for once, the same identical views of the two most important actors on the international scene: U.S. and EU.

After the Afghan discontent and disruption in Iraq, now travels the continent joined the Bush administration, at least in intention. The penalties for now appear to be lowest common denominator that could unlock the vetoes that are from the east.

Un passo avanti dunque, dopo il problema Iran, verso la strada della riconciliazione globale tra Marte e Venere ( Kagan).

Temi come il riscaldamento globale, il terrorismo, e resistenti regimi sanguinari come la Birmania , non possono venire affrontati da punti di vista differenti.

Strutture orizzontali come Al-Qaeda, di per sé difficili da identificare, devono almeno sapere che la Comunità internazionale nella sua maggioranza è schierata su una determinata posizione.

Apparentemente le sanzioni sembrano poca cosa verso un regime che è abituato political and economic isolation. In North Korea the situation is perhaps easier because Kim and political system have made a mistake which is proving to be serious: the nuclear deterrent.

move that has alarmed the international community and put in a difficult China and Russia.

In Burma, economic interests are almost nonexistent, and China in the first place, yielding to international pressure would then be more complicated.

Meanwhile, the scheme goes ahead. He also talks about the response "moderate . Probably because in recent years, knows he has acted in a much more brutal.

It seems that the protests from many parts of the world we are. The consensus therefore is unanimous in condemning what is happening. The demonstrations are slower to organize since there is clearly an expression of democracy against which (the U.S., Israel, France etc.)..

For some the left protest against a regime seems strange. But in time maybe we'll get them too.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Network Dvd Changer On My Way To My Mcse 2003!

Majority

the House accidents parliamentary for the majority ...

Tvs Msp Using It Extensively In My Work

Liberalism can be "compassionate"?

Giavazzi always reminds us how liberalism can be a valuable tool for the economic policies of the center-left.

is widespread elevates the concept of "compassionate liberalism".

In this way we try to give a label to a concept of social world and social person who is not. The market is a game between players competing for a goal. The competition is the basis of the functioning of both supply and demand when it comes to electricity market, labor, or financial. If agree to compete there will always be someone who benefits from it and someone loses. So there will be those who are better off and those who are worse. The incentive to the individual should be to always improve. By this logic underlying the more developed economies.

Giavazzi always reminds us how to help the weak is not so much to help the retirees, but to help young people. I also think it is true. The problem of the left, Giavazzi not stress is that its leadership is unable to conceive of the aid, if not through "take one to give to another."

This is nothing but a concept of class, that can only lead egalitarianism, in fact enemy of those who profess liberal liberal.

be "compassionate" I do not think the flexibility or accept the rules.

In a system that is evolving with the flexibility and mobility are physiological in the labor market. The difference is those who accept it before and after. But sooner or later we all come.

Same thing for the rules. In markets like the present, uncertain, unstable and constantly at risk bubble, think about free markets and let the "invisible hand" Smithian fa sorridere.

Da un mercato libero a un mercato delle regole il passo è stato breve. Il punto non è che chi accetta le regole è meno liberista di chi le regole non le concepisce nel mercato. Il punto è che spesso senza regole sparisce il mercato stesso.

Da liberale invece si dovrebbe sottolineare come gli eventi e la società dovrebbero plasmare la classe politica e le sue idee. Se il mondo si evolve, la politica dovrebbe recepire ed adeguarsi, senza usare come una clava principi ed etichette in nome della stessa competizione politica.

Clinton e Blair non erano liberalisti convinced. They just realized that the fiscal and economic revolutions of years earlier were maintained as a "right", not when politically acceptable.

The principles remain, the policy is evolving. Label as "compassionate" who is liberal but "not quite" part of politics and demagoguery that Deform intellectual typical of those who preach well and in many cases Razzola own.

Alesina and Giavazzi bargained for a party. E 'physiological in a world that constantly takes sides. They try to make their contribution to the reformist cause and hope that is born do not take conservative tendencies. They do a dirty job, however.

Liberalism is a valuable weapon, but that should be used in a certain way. The problem is who needs reform.

is not whether Adam Smith, Mill, and Ricardo had the right or left. These reforms must be made in the interest of the people, not the ruling class.

Liberalism can not be labeled right or left for the simple fact that it is uncomfortable because of what's here and there, just as free.

The idea same policy is not entirely in conformity with freedom. Politicians and economists would do well to think of giving labels less and make more reforms. Only those who will tell us is liberal or not, regardless of political color.

Prolexis Enhancement Reviews

Grillo little violent for the "Manifesto"

From manifesto calling for more violence . According to the newspaper founded by Speech and Rossanda, Cricket is becoming a mirror of anti-and the only advantage that it is the ultimate anti-political: The Cav.

The "Manifesto" so no exceptions. not enough to have in your area convicted of a meal that bombs and armed struggle, proclaimed himself condemned, but in the name of social struggles (tossing bombs is good for society?). Now we also find tips to force the hand.

Put even more demagoguery and verbal violence seems to be the right card to encompass the "joker" in the flow of the left. They say that in fact put more violence is all about satire.

seems to me rather than raise a personal touch to each individual policy can only lead people to hatred towards a policy which must be corrected, not fallen apart.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Cloridrato De Monoidratado

But the company is no better than "caste"

The Courier as usual from space to various disappointed center-left.

Nicola Rossi explains how the problem of the majority is of a cultural and not political. 'S why the people protest, and is fed up with a policy that seems to be getting further away from the people. We await only the refuge now on the Aventine.

But politics, despite its flaws, and in his illness, the concept of the word politics, is not it better society.

The ruling class is the mirror of society.

In a country where 30% of GDP evasion can not think that politicians do qualms about buying entire buildings in Rome at bargain prices. E 'typical of our society to think only own backyard. It has not always stood the best, but the wiser.

A society that lives on pension and it turns out the parasite itself has 30 MPs who have been convicted. In other states would not be tolerated, but even that would not have tolerated the average time to find work in Italy for a recent graduate is 100 days.

The cast is there. Throw a living. In the middle of the caste, there are honest people honest and others less. But even the newspapers we read are a caste. Even when we go by the accountant for the tax return or by a notary for a card, we are in the presence of "caste". Così come quando apriamo un conto corrente.

Il problema è che l’Italia da sempre vive di “caste”.

I costi della politica c’erano anche vent’anni fa. Alla gente andava bene. Perché lascia fare. Fin quando la gente non è pressata dalla politica e dal progresso lascia fare. Ha lasciato fare per cinquant’anni. Ora si ribella.

Un altro difetto dell’italiano medio è quello di farsi influenzare da tribuni popolari, raccogliere lo scettro della protesta, manifestare, urlare, e poi chi si è visto si è visto. “ Can che abbaia non dorme”. Altro tratteggio tipico di una società che protesta contro se stessa.

Grillo, costituzionalista di indubbia fama, ci dice che per colpa di questa legge elettorale, le nomine sono decise dall’alto. E’ per questo che i condannati siedono in Parlamento.

I condannati sedevano anche prima del 2001 però, e quei condannati sono stati condannati per atti commessi anche prime del 93, mentre sedevano ( già?!! ) in parlamento.

La legge elettorale è importante ma non credo sia la cura per risolvere i problemi del Paese.

A corporate society, closed, equally deserves the politicians we have.

a political class that does not fulfill the promises made by elected officials is the same people who design and produce the improbable little or nothing, with the result that the worst and the best are here because they plan to go abroad have ideas, and put these ideas into practice.

The people want certain things to be heard, because the "cheer" is the human mind, and spirit of a society that thinks big, but actually lives on the appearance and false promises.

A society that speaks newspeak and want to hear about in political jargon.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Dvd Player Review False Label

For Ahmadinejad to respond with facts and Juve










Iranian President we all know. We know how he is. We know as a reason. E 'was invited to speak at Columbia University, and this has sparked an uproar.

the merits, the mere fact that the Hitler of 2007 to propose a referendum on the state of Israel is weak at the knees. But I wonder, is it right to call a character so uncomfortable and put in a position where he would put the caller, if there at university in Tehran?

E 'right to get to his level, forcing it to dry answers?

Ahmadinejad at his house would do so.

Not knowing what the rule of law and market rules, does not know what could be the objection, the divergence, the contrast.

Iranian president in New Jork did the figure of the victim. A victim in front of Western imperialism which claims to be always right.

A gentleman, in my opinion, we must respond with facts. If he claims to be the absolute and the political wing of the Supreme Council of Ayatollah, then please explain what you said.

On the ground of demagoguery and the offense he wins. Vince who think like him. Vince intolerance.

civil protests in the square are the salt of democracy, but every now and then Ahmadinejad would be curious to ask the meaning of his accusations, and his statements. The justification of the crap that we propina every day.

In this way, the culture, and facts can destroy the fabric of dogma and absolute values, which is imbued with the mind of a man so determined, as ruthless as the Iranian president.


Monday, September 24, 2007

Dvd Player Samsung Dvd Player Good For The Money

Roma.Pari right. Brilla Fiorentina

Juve draw in Rome. A tie arrivato per due motivi. In primo luogo la Roma ha presentato la stessa formazione di mercoledì, e quindi ci si poteva attendere comunque un calo fisico nella ripresa.

In seconda battuta la formazione d’emergenza ideata da Ranieri mette in difficoltà una squadra quadrata che gioca palla a terra come la Roma.

Mettere Iaquinta largo sulla destra vuol dire stoppare la fascia. Mancini non è uno che torna e rimanendo isolato, finisce nella tela del fuorigioco Juve, ieri finalmente attuata bene.

I tre centrocampisti mediani con un Nedved sacrificato danno la garanzia al centrocampo di non essere in inferiorità numerica davanti a un vero e proprio gioiello come quello romano . Tutto sommato le mosse di Ranieri hanno funzionato. Unico neo la difesa, dove Criscito forse ha capito che è indietro di 10 kg rispetto al peso forma, e Andrade perso fino a fine anno.

Tornerà sul mercato la dirigenza?

Una Juve buona quindi, ma prevedibile. I problemi rimangono. Non c’è nessuno in grado di fare gioco. Almiron e Tiago sono da rimandare ( per quanto?), e l’unico nelle idee del tecnico che funge da registra dovrebbe essere Camoranesi. Unfortunately, the Italian ace was injured. Now there Iaquinta. Guarantee the extension of the team, but would someone of quality in midfield.

With a physical team like Inter Milan or vertical as I doubt you can think of proposing an emergency team. Harmony between departments and will serve as a game that does not currently exist.

Inter effort anyway. The team does not seem to chop all of last year, but in my opinion the problem is the preparation. I think that Moratti and Mancini have aimed to make an end of season on a high, a bit 'like Milan last year. therefore waiting to see if Spring Inter will aim for a cup that is missing for forty years.

Milan is Milan. Slow in this league and cup. It seems almost in its history and in his nature to play at night after the famous hymn taken from the Queen. A team was born to suffer, who prefers the slow and the weather on Wednesday, rather than the fields often affected by natural disasters and tough game in our house.

el'Atalanta Fiorentina Udinese together represent the most interesting of queste prime giornate. In particolare la Fiorentina dimostra, anche cambiando gli uomini, di avere un’organico all’altezza per mirare alla Champions. Non sarà facile, soprattutto quando la Juve recupererà quasi tutti gli effettivi, ma Prandelli sa che ha a disposizione una squadra che può mettere in difficoltà chiunque . Una squadra che al netto delle penalizzazioni ha fatto 3 punti in più della Roma negli ultimi due anni. Firenze attende qualcosa di grande.

Prandelli è l’uomo giusto per realizzare i sogni di un’intera regione.

Ieri lo United Chelsea has sunk. Good test of Manchester that wiped out the voices of those who said that the rule last year was unique.

Chelsea that seems closer to Ronaldinho , the victim of rumors and gossip from our own than to shudder. After Mourinho's resignation, even his biggest detractors feel the lack of an awkward, but able to create a group with a rose full of samples, but difficult to engage.

joint that seems to reward the words of Sir Alex Ferguson Arsenal.

Indeed the team without Henry seems more free and although many young people, seems to repeat the exploits of two years ago. Fabregas and Adebayor are the actual driving of a group that played by memory in his coach and has the true champion.

Real Madrid clumsy, effort and last equalized with a network of former bluagrana Saviola. wonder if Schuster will rely more on him now, considering the dull start to the season for Higuain.

Barcelona back through the third jewel Messi, now probably the strongest player in the world. Its a shotgun that has the same Sevilla, increasingly in crisis after international defeats with Arsenal and AC Milan in the Super Cup.

Note positive for Italian football are 4 goals in 5 matches in by Toni and Germany's double Giuseppe Rossi came in Spain where 80 ', has defeated the ambitions the newly promoted Murcia.

with Villarreal Giuseppe Rossi, Nihat, Tomasson and certainly can aspire to a place in the Champions League.

High Definition Makeup Love This

Danger Iraq for Afghanistan?










We in Afghanistan for 6 years and the days pass more and more growing doubts and anxieties related to the mission. Two Italian soldiers have been released, but you can not see how the situation is considerably more complex than is envisaged.

The dreaded descent from the mountains of the Taliban in the spring there was . On allied forces or inability to organize the Taliban? What is certain is that in the provinces of Herat and Kandahar have continued attacks on le forse americane e le forse Isaf, e a nulla è valso il tentativo di Karzai di raggiungere un accordo con le fazioni che appoggiano in modo dichiarato i Talebani.

L’Afghanistan è un territorio denso di incognite e la composizione del territorio non aiuta le forze alleate. Già nel 2001 l’Alleanza del Nord, le truppe meglio equipaggiate su cui potevano contare gli U.S.A, hanno registrato difficoltà nel fare piazza pulita nella regione del Waziristan, tra il Pakistan e l’Afghanistan, dove si presupponeva fosse la base operativa di Al-Qaeda.

Dopo 6 anni il problema iracheno torna alla luce anche qui.

L’obbiettivo militare è stato raggiunto, anche se voci dicono che Karzai governava fino al 2005 solo a Kabul, e ora neanche tutta la città è sotto la guida del nuovo governo. La politica lascia a desiderare.

I taliban, grazie al commercio dell’oppio ( 98% del mercato è afgano) hanno raggiunto un buon grado di indipendenza e l’etnica pashtun tacitamente non rinnega che sotto il regime non si viveva poi così male . Etnia che tra l’altro è determinante per la sorte in Pakistan, dove Musharraf è in bilico tra le pressione americane e l’estremismo islamico che dilaga .

Fiore all’occhiello della guerra al terrorismo, l’Afghanista sembra ora inviso da gran parte dell’opinione pubblica. I continui attentati non aiutano di certo né l’Amministrazione Bush, bisognosa di vittorie politiche per arrivare alla presidenziali con un buon credito, né l’Europa dove i governi hanno scommesso sull’Afghanistan per distanziarsi proprio da una guerra dichiarata come “unilaterale” come quella in Iraq.

Non si può andare via ora anche dall’Afghanistan ovviamente . Rimane il fatto che il tempo trascorso è complessivamente fino ad ora più lungo rispetto alla prima e la seconda guerra mondiale. Tentare di inglobare i Taliban al potere potrebbe essere una mossa realisticamente interessante.

Potrebbe essere un deterrente contro le aspirazioni di ribaltamento politico dell’ex regime , anche se è comunque rischioso dare una mano a chi la dava ( dà) a sua volta ai terroristi.

Se l’offensiva di primavera non ha dato i suoi frutti probabilmente la guerriglia non è poi così organizzata come si temeva e allora prima dell’inverno urgerebbe un blitz tra le montagne, data la differenze di uomini in campo tra Nato e U.S.A.

You must go on then, to bring peace to a people between 30 years and is killed in war.

The danger is clear, however.

A war of attrition but here as in Iraq, threatens the long-term strengthening of terrorism, galvanized by a West weak and unable to get to the bottom where it is called to defend freedom .